Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jonathan Gray vs Tim Van Terheijden Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gray vs Terheijden analysis and find out who is favored!
Jonathan Gray vs Tim Van Terheijden Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gray 1 - 0 Terheijden
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gray has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Terheijden has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gray, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Terheijden has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gray has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Terheijden has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gray has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Terheijden winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gray has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 94/ 74), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4). Terheijden has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 91/ 82), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gray winning 1 times and Terheijden being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gray winning 2 and Terheijden winning 0. The last match between Gray and Terheijden was at the Greece F2 (Heraklion), 07-03-2018, First, Hard with Jonathan Gray getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gray and Terheijden have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gray winning 0 times and Terheijden 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Gray winning 1, and Terheijden 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gray has played against opponents with an average rank of while Terheijden has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gray has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Terheijden has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gray has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Terheijden has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
893
Rank
538
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
34
Age
L
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
52% (133-122)
Career Total W/L
52% (113-103)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gray VS Terheijden H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Jonathan Gray | Tim Van Terheijden |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 6 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (38/55) | 46% (31/68) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (26/38) | 65% (20/31) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 65% (11/17) | 35% (13/37) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (35/68) | 33% (18/55) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Gray VS Terheijden H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(3) 6-0 |
Stats 
Jonathan Gray
Player
Tim Van Terheijden
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
46%
(
31 of
68)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jonathan Gray | Tim Van Terheijden |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Jonathan Gray Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Jonathan Gray
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Jonathan Gray
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
62)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonathan Gray
Player
Kirill Kivattsev
51%
(
20 of
39)
1st Serve %
78%
(
29 of
37)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
46
Total Points Won
30
|
6-3 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hady Habib
Player
Jonathan Gray
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
4-6 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonathan Gray
Player
Mateo Berta
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Gianluca Acquaroli
Player
Jonathan Gray
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
72%
(
47 of
65)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jonathan Gray
Player
Duckhee Lee
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve %
64%
(
27 of
42)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
48%
(
11 of
23)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
23%
(
3 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
61%
(
22 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
34
Total Points Won
44
|
4-6 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jonathan Gray
Player
Nathan Seateun
79%
(
57 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonathan Gray
Player
Omar El-Moslemany
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alex Marti Pujolras
Player
Jonathan Gray
71%
(
76 of
107)
1st Serve %
83%
(
85 of
102)
1
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
54%
(
41 of
76)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
45 of
85)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
50%
(
53 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
50 of
102)
104
Total Points Won
105
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Tim Van Terheijden Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Tim Van Terheijden
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Terheijden
Player
Mats Hermans
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
47%
(
28 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Javier Naser
Player
Tim Van Terheijden
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
57%
(
69 of
122)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
16
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
17 of
53)
29%
(
7 of
24)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
46 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
60 of
122)
110
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Tim Van Terheijden
67%
(
66 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
8
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
38 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
36 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
7-6(5) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Terheijden
Player
Giorgio Ricca
72%
(
43 of
60)
1st Serve %
64%
(
41 of
64)
0
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Gray Vs Terheijden Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
